hsonline

Archive for July, 2006

We need a revolution in the education system in India?

In Education(शिक्षा), Philosophy (दर्शन) on July 31, 2006 at 10:49 am

Education builds the man so it builds the nation. Today we claim to be the biggest human resources supplier for the world, but are we concerned what quality of human capital we are building and for whose needs? We supply bureaucrats to the government, software engineers to the IT companies around the world, highly paid managers to the multinationals, we supply engineers and science graduates as researchers to the foreign universities. What capital are we building for ourselves?

India aspires to be powerful, it wants to play a role in the international community, for that to happen, its economy has to grow multifold and for that to happen, it requires a huge force of entrepreneurs who could transform it into a nation which produces, from the one which only consumes. India needs a huge force of innovators who could make it self reliant in all kinds of sciences and technologies. India needs artists who could make its culture the most popular in the world. A culture which is not only saleable itself but also helps in selling India’s products across the world. In a nutshell, India needs Henry Fords, Bill Gateses, Thomas Alva Edisons and Michael Jacksons born and educated in India.

One may say we had few. Yes, we had. M. S. Swaminathan who made India self reliant in food grains, Dhiru Bhai Ambani who proved a common man can become a billionaire, Dr. Varghese Kurien who is the father of Amul milk movement, Dr. A. P. J. Abdul Kalam who dared to build missiles for India, Pundit Ravishankar who is the ambassador of the Indian music to the world. Such people though in small numbers, were always there. But they are not the products of this education system. This system did not teach them how to become innovators or entrepreneurs or artists. Had it done so, they would have been millions in numbers. These people were inspired themselves. To some of them, their education may have given the technical know-how (though it is hardly conceivable), but not the dream or the inspiration needed. It is the education which should inspire one to become something one really wants to. Education should make you free, should make you experiment and it should make you ask questions. Ultimately, it should make you realize what you are.

Youngsters in India, do not have the freedom of selecting there career, it is said. They are forced to become engineers, doctors, MBA’s and IAS officers, it is said. Yes, agree. But that is not the problem. The problem is, youngsters in India do not have the vision to think beyond. Neither their parents, nor their grandparents had that vision. This is where the root of the problem is. Generations have gone through a system which sucks. Now the beauty is even the law-makers and educators of today’s India are products of that age old system. That is why no less than a revolution is needed in the education system in India.

What do we expect from such a revolution?

A revolution means big changes. We expect the revolution in education to bring lots of changes. These changes will result into:

1. Best talents of the country working in the education sector.


Today, education is not the career of choice, but it is the career of compromise. If you are a teacher, people sympathize, they curse the prevalent unemployment in the country. Education is one of the highest profit making ‘industries’ in the service sector, but its workers are the least paid compared to those working in somewhat glamorous sectors like the IT industry. This has to change.

2. A world class infrastructure.

The experience of shopping at malls is better than the old dirty bazaars. The experience of traveling in a metro train is much better than suffering in the city buses. The experience of driving on four or six lane highways is much better the same way. The same way, infrastructure has a meaning in education. World class universities and schools with world class libraries, laboratories and classrooms, in a world class building make a world class infrastructure for education.

3. Greater investments into education, public as well as private.

We need world class infrastructure and best talents in all schools and universities of India. These resources should not remain limited to a handful of IIT’s or IIM’s. Each village should have a school with all resources and facilities. Each university should have whatever it needs for a better education. This would require huge money and hence, huge investments.

4. Education which encourages innovation and creativity.

When farmers in the villages of Punjab make a vehicle from the diesel engine and name it Maruta (A male version of Maruti), that is innovation. When villagers of the Rajasthan and Gujarat transform the Bike ‘Enfield Bullet’ into a local auto-rickshaw, that is creativity. How many automobile engineering students could do likewise? The question is, how many?

5. Education which encourages entrepreneurship.

In a Hindi movie ‘Nayak’, the father of the actress refuses to permit for her marriage with the actor because he is not a government servant. At last, he permits, but then the Actor had become the chief minister of the state. This mindset of the society, particularly of the middle class, has to be changed. You are not a respectful person if after education you start a business, as that is seen as a failure in getting a job. It is the task of the education system to change this mindset. It also has to inspire the youth for the necessary courage and vision for entrepreneurship.

6. An education which makes a child sad when the last bell is rung at the end of the day in the school.

Who should be next CM of Chhattisgarh? छत्तीसगढ़ का अगला मुख्यमंत्री कौन?

In Current Issues (सामयिक) on July 24, 2006 at 7:29 pm

Who should be the next CM for Chhattisgarh? 

 Let me not make any introductory paragraph with beautiful lines. All in Chhattisgarh are thinking who next? I would first say a big NO to Dr. Raman Singh. He has simply failed in proving himself to be a visionary and a candidate worth considering for a second term. We have seen only two Chief Ministers in Chhattisgarh and the later has failed in fulfilling all hopes at all fronts, simply because he fails to have the first prerequisite to become a CM, the vision. I will, hence not analyze his 2.5 years tenure but simply discuss what was done by his predecessor in his tenure of 3 years. The point I want to make is, ours is a new state with great expectations and huge potential, and it thus requires to be ruled by someone with a great vision, excellent executioner’s skills, and an ability to think rationally and innovatively. To put it simply, we want a CEO for our state and not a politician. Unfortunately we did not get one yet. And we haven’t found one yet. In this post, I will discuss why I would like the developmental policies of Mr. Ajit Jogi to be continued by the next chief minister, and why I would not like Mr. Jogi to become the chief minister of the state for the second term.

Ajit Jogi the CEO: 

Following reasons make me to conclude that he is an excellent visionary and a good manager:

  1. His decision to establish CSEB (State electricity Board) soon after the state formation. This was a decision which made Chhattisgarh a power surplus state. And he took this decision at the discomfort of his counterpart in Madhya Pradesh without whose support he would not have become the first CM of the state. It is he who envisioned Chhattisgarh as the power hub of the country.
  2. His decision to close operations of State Road Transport Corporation and many other public sector companies. It was a courageous decision. While several states in India suffer from this burden called SRTC; they do not have that courage.
  3. Merger of RDA (Raipur Development Authority) with RMC (The Municipal Corporation of
    Raipur). His decision to shut down the Housing Board. Abolishing Commissioner System (Three Divisions Raipur, Bilaspur and Jagdalpur ceased to exist, there was only one Revenue division in Bilaspur, this decision was repelled by the new government). These examples are sufficient to infer that he had started something like a Business Process Re-engineering (BPR) in the state.
  4. Introduction of a three years medical degree course. I guess he thought of this course because he wanted doctors in villages. It takes 7-10 years for an MCI certified course to produce a medical graduate. Though the arrogant MCI did not approve of the course, enough to conclude that he had innovative ideas and the guts to implement them.
  5. Opening of private universities. We know what happened later. Though there were some policy flaws on the part of conditions or entry barriers to ensure that only quality institutes would open, this had the potential not only to revolutionize the education system in
    India but also to make Chhattisgarh the hub of higher education in the country.
  6. Fast progress on infrastructure (Roads, Dams, Bridges etc.).
  7. Conversion of many government schools in to CBSE pattern.
  8. Abolishment of PET and PMT examinations. It was a good decision. Not all parents can send there children to
    Kota or even Bhilai and pay high fees of coaching institutes. Also, this would have saved students from the pressure of two examinations.
  9. The Industrial policy which resulted in Chhattisgarh becoming Sponge-Iron manufacturing hub in the country. There were some other MOU’s in steel and power. (Though we did not get something like POSCO or Mittal’s investment as in the case of Orisa and Jharkhand)
  10. Crack down of notorious anti social elements
  11. His efforts to change the crop cycle of the state.

Ajit Jogi the politician:

It is not bad to be a politician; we have seen the likes of Prime Minister Nehru who were a CEO as well as a politician. But today’s politics is different and in that politics Mr. Jogi is no different:

  1. His less democratic values:

(a)    “हमारी काँग्रेस पार्टी के विधायक, श्री बलिराम कश्यप के नेतृत्व में बनने वाली सरकार का समर्थन करते हैं” (The Legislators of our Congress Party Support the government to be established under the leadership of Mr. Baliram Kashyap). This was his letter to the governor of the state, just after the election results were out. That was simply an act to destabilize the state government which was yet to be established. This raises questions about his respect to democratic traditions. Although he regrets writing a letter without being elected as the leader of the new CLP (Congress Legislator’s Party), if I am not incorrect, he still thinks what he did was right as he supported the efforts to establish a government with a leadership of an Adivasi. Even if the tapes produced by the BJP of his talks with Mr. Virendra Pandey, an aid of Mr. Baliram Kashyap, are not real, he at least tried to do away with the verdict of people who replaced him and elected BJP as the party with a majority in the state assembly.

(b)   His successful effort to break 12 BJP MLA’s and induct them into congress. The Tarun Chatterjee Episode. When the Congress party had full majority in the state assembly, what was the need?

(c)    The infamous April 2001 lathi charge on BJP leaders protesting against the government in
Raipur. Many opposition leaders including the leader of opposition Mr. Nand Kuamr Sai were injured seriously.

    2.   His cast based politics:

Again refereeing to the previous point, he supports the idea that there should be a tribal as the chief minister of this state as majority of the people in the state are tribesman. I do not believe that problems of a community can be solved only when someone from a particular cast will become a chief minister. If he supports this, he is not my candidate for the post of the chief minister of the state. There are few more instances, an effort under the leadership of ex DGP Mr. RLS Yadav to convene a big congregation of backward casts (probably to do a
Bihar in Chhattisgarh), and the ‘cast based’ dinner parties at ‘Karuna’ his official residence. It was probably unique of its kind that a chief minister invites people to dinner on the basis of which cast they belong to. If these dinner parties were funded from the exchequer’, then no words to condemn it.

 

I welcome comments

Hitendra

शॉपिंग मॉल

In इन दिनों...These Days... on July 12, 2006 at 3:23 pm

हुए बहुत दिन बुढ़िया एक चलती थी लाठी को टेक
उसके पास बहुत था माल

जाना था उसको शॉपिंग मॉल

जब बुढिया पहुँची शॉपिंग मॉल

भीड़ से था बुरा हाल

संडे का था बड़ा फ़ुटफ़ाल

मोलभाव करते करते, उमर बुढिया की बीती थी।

पर मॉल में सौदेबाजी की, अजब अनोखी रीति थी॥

मोलभाव ना होता था, क्या महँगा क्या सस्ता।

लेना हो तो ले लो भैया, वर्ना नापो रस्ता॥

तो मॉल ने एक पूरी सभ्यता को खत्म करने का बीड़ा उठाया है। “नगद बड़े शौक से, उधार अगले चौक से” ये कहकर भी प्यार से सामान देने वाला हमारे पड़ोस का दुकानदार कहाँ जाएगा? यूँ खत्म तो नहीं होगा वो। पर संपन्न घरों के बच्चे इस पूरी सांस्कृतिक विरासत से अछूते रह जाएँगे। मुझे दुकानदारों से ज़्यादा उनकी फ़िक्र है। सारी जेबें टटोल कर किसी तरह पैसे चुकाने और क़्रेडिट कार्ड फ़िराकर (स्वैप कर) सामान खरीद लेने में बहुत अंतर है। मॉल को पूरा हक है कि वो बढ़े और सुहुलियत बढ़ाये। पर ये सांस्कृतिक ह्रास की कीमत पर ना हो। अन्यथा जो पैसे से अमीर हैं वो संस्कृति से खासे ग़रीब हो जायेंगे।

मॉल तुम आगे बढ़ो, पर हमें पीछे ना धकेलो।